ELargo Holdings, LLC, which holds copyrights to the 2015 action film Close Range, has filed several BitTorrent copyright infringement suits in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, among the first such lawsuits in the U.S.

According to a pithy Hollywood Reporter review, Close Range is directed by “[l]ow-budget action maestro Isaac Florentine,” and stars British MMA fighter Scott Adkins as a mercenary battling a Mexican drug cartel.

The new lawsuits in Oregon alleges copyright infringement by “Doe” parties through their use of BitTorrent file-sharing software. Along with generic allegations of BitTorrent-based copyright infringement, the suits seek statutory damages pursuant to the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees and costs, and an injunction against further infringement.

The Oregon complaints also alleges that “ELargo is owned by Bleiberg Entertainment, LLC, a production company with a notable
catalog of major motion pictures. (www.bleibergent.com)” Troll Defense is aware of Bleiberg Entertainment itself acting as a plaintiff in previous copyright actions in Arizona, Ohio and Tennessee.

Like many other similar lawsuits filed in U.S. District Court, District of Oregon, the ELargo cases were filed by Salem, OR attorney Carl D. Crowell and Crowell Law. A case listing with links to the complaints is below.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of the case can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Filed: 03/09/2016
Case No: 3:16-cv-00431
ELargo Holdings, LLC v. DOE-75.150.47.246, et al.

Filed: 03/30/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00545
ELargo Holdings, LLC v. Doe-50.186.8.131

Filed: 03/30/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00546
ELargo Holdings, LLC v. Doe-24.21.250.141

Filed: 03/30/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00547
ELargo Holdings, LLC v. Doe-76.115.199.19

QOTD Film Investment Ltd., which holds copyrights to the newly-released Werner Herzog epic “Queen of the Desert,” has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. As noted in a prior troll defense post, “Queen of the Desert” stars James Franco, Nicole Kidman and Robert Pattinson, and the Washington suit is part of an emerging national trolling campaign.

The new lawsuit alleges copyright infringement by 14 separate “Doe” parties through their use of BitTorrent file-sharing software. The case seeks statutory damages pursuant to the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees and costs, and an injunction against further infringement.

As noted in the prior post regarding QOTD, the nominal copyright holder is an affiliate of Benaroya Pictures, which was founded by “Michael Benaroya, scion of a prominent Seattle real-estate family,” who began backing films in 2009, including past titles such as “New York, I Love You,” “The Romantics,” “Catch .44,” “Margin Call” and “The Words.” According to IMDb, Benaroya Pictures has several other unreleased titles in production or development, and Troll Defense would not be surprised to see more of its titles in BitTorrent litigation in the future.

Like many other similar lawsuits filed in the Western District, this complaint was signed by attorney David A. Lowe of Lowe Graham Jones PLLC.  A case listing with link to the complaint is below.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of the case can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Case No: 2:16-cv-00371

QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Does 1-14

Filed: 03/11/2016

In recent days, two film production companies affiliated with with Voltage Pictures, LLC have filed amended lawsuits personally naming scores of previously anonymous defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.

Dallas Buyers Club, LLC filed seven amended complaints naming a total of 39 individuals.  As has been widely reported by Troll Defense and others, Dallas Buyers Club is an award-winning 2013 film starring Matthew McConaughey which movie has been the subject of dozens of copyright infringement actions filed in federal courts across the U.S. over the past few years.  Additional coverage of the Seattle DBC cases is here and here.

Cobbler Nevada, LLC filed twelve amended complaints naming a total of 128 individuals.  As Troll Defense previously reported in relation to these cases, The Cobbler is comedy film starring Adam Sandler that was widely released earlier this year, with generally unfavorable reviews and uncertain box office revenues.

These amended complaints were each made by Seattle attorney David A. Lowe of Lowe Graham Jones PLLC.  A case listing with links to amended complaints is below.  The decision to personally sue the defendants follows earlier orders by the judges managing these cases which denied the plaintiffs’ requests to subpoena ISP subscribers to depositions, directing the film companies to first name individuals and purge the cases of any remaining “Doe” defendants.

The recent complaints were mostly sent with requests for waivers of personal service of process pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  To avoid the risks associated with additional court costs and potential defaults, parties should be careful to keep track of the deadlines for responses set forth in the papers received.

Parties receiving notices of these actions can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Case No: 2:15-cv-01404
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (5)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No: 2:15-cv-01406
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (7)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No: 2:15-cv-01408
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (6)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No: 2:15-cv-01420
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (12)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No: 2:15-cv-01421
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (4)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No. 2:15-cv-01430
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (8)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No. 2:15-cv-01431
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (10)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No. 2:15-cv-01432
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (17)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No. 2:15-cv-01435
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (14)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No: 2:15-cv-01443
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (12)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No: 2:15-cv-01614
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (8)
Filed: 03/09/2016

Case No: 2:15-cv-01616
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does (21)
Filed: 3/09/2016

Case No. 2:14-cv-133
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does (3)
Filed: 03/04/2016

Case No. 2:14-cv-01684
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does (2)
Filed: 03/04/2016

Case No. 2:15-cv-582
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does (11)
Filed: 03/04/2016

Case No. 2:14-cv-1926
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does (6)
Filed: 03/04/2016

Case No. 2:15-cv-581
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does (2)
Filed: 03/04/2016

Case No. 2:15-cv-579
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does (5)
Filed: 03/04/2016

Case No. 2:15-cv-576
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does (10)
Filed: 03/04/2016

Film production companies affiliated with with Voltage Pictures, LLC have filed new copyright infringement lawsuits against “John Doe” defendants in two separate U.S. District Courts in Louisiana.

First, Dallas Buyers Club, LLC filed a “singleton” case against a Doe party in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana, based in Baton Rouge.  As has been widely reported by Troll Defense and others, Dallas Buyers Club is an award-winning 2013 film starring Matthew McConaughey which movie has been the subject of dozens of copyright infringement actions filed in federal courts across the U.S. over the past few years.

A few days later, Clear Skies Nevada, LLC docketed another case against a single Doe party in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, situated in New Orleans.  Clear Skies Nevada, LLC is the rights-holder with respect to the 2014 film Good Kill, which concerns a military drone pilot (played by Ethan Hawke) who questions the ethics of dropping bombs in Afghanistan from his remote post in Nevada.

Both of the new lawsuits allege copyright infringement by the defendants through their use of BitTorrent file-sharing software to copy and distribute the films at issue.  Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that “Defendant acted in a collective and interdependent manner with others via the Internet to unlawfully reproduce and distribute Plaintiff’s copyrighted Motion Picture by means of the interactive ‘peer-to-peer’ (‘P2P’) file transfer technology protocol called BitTorrent.”  The plaintiffs seek statutory damages pursuant to the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees and costs, and an injunction against further infringement.

As with other similar lawsuits in other jurisdictions, Voltage Pictures, LLC is the likely instigator, with distribution rights or co-production credits with regard to each title.  Voltage Pictures is said to be the driving force behind hundreds of similar BitTorrent copyright actions that have been filed in recent years.

UPDATE (4/8/16):

Additional singleton suits were filed in the Eastern District by QOTD Film Investment, Ltd. and Glacier Films (USA), Inc.

QOTD Film Investment Ltd. holds copyrights to the newly-released Werner Herzog epic “Queen of the Desert.”  As noted in a prior troll defense post, “Queen of the Desert” stars James Franco, Nicole Kidman and Robert Pattinson, and the new suit is part of an emerging national trolling campaign.

The Glacier Films (USA), Inc. case involves the 2014 crime film “American Heist,” with Hayden Christensen and Adrien Brody.

UPDATE (5/14/16):

ELargo Holdings, LLC, which holds copyrights to the 2015 action film Close Range, has filed additional BitTorrent copyright infringement suits in the Eastern and Western Districts of Louisiana.  As noted in a prior Troll Defense post, Close Range is directed by “[l]ow-budget action maestro Isaac Florentine,” and stars British MMA fighter Scott Adkins as a mercenary battling a Mexican drug cartel.

At least one case was filed in the same court by Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC, which owns the rights to the Russell Crowe drama Fathers and Daughters.

All of the Louisiana lawsuits were filed by Patrick Miller, LLC in New Orleans.  Below is a case listing with links to the complaints.

Filed: 02/20/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00112
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Doe-174.64.14.54

Filed: 02/22/2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-01511
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe-68.96.33.171

Filed: 03/31/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00210
Elargo Holdings, LLC v. DOE-68.105.146.38

Filed: 04/05/2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-02800
GLACIER FILMS (USA), INC v. DOE- 172.10.126.139

Filed: 04/05/2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-02803
QOTD FILM INVESTMENT LTD v. DOE- 104.57.244.173

Filed: 04/06/2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-02867
Elargo Holdings, LLC v. DOE- 104.5.232.186

Filed: 04/12/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00480
ELargo Holdings, LLC v. Doe 209.33.29.66

Filed: 04/14/2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-03144
Elargo Holdings, LLC v. DOE- 74.170.139.35

Filed: 04/19/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00250
Elargo Holdings, LLC v. Doe-162.234.117.120

Filed: 04/20/2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-03467
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. Doe-76.107.58.169

Filed: 11/04/2016
Case No. 5:16-cv-01557
GLACIER FILMS (USA), INC v. DOE- 73.203.180.24

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of the cases can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC , the owner of rights to the Russell Crowe drama Fathers and Daughters, has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal court in Oregon.

Fathers and Daughters was released in Europe and Asia last year, but did not reach U.S. audiences until July 2016.  The film has received middling reviews thus far, according to Metacritic.

The new lawsuit in Oregon alleges copyright infringement by 9 separate “Doe” parties through their use of BitTorrent file-sharing software. Along with generic allegations of BitTorrent-based copyright infringement, the suits also state that “F&D comes to court seeking relief as the motion picture Fathers & Daughters is the subject of significant piracy and has been illegally downloaded and distributed hundreds of thousands of times worldwide with many of confirmed instances of infringing activity traced to the State of Oregon.” The case seeks statutory damages pursuant to the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees and costs, and an injunction against further infringement.

Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC is owned by Voltage Pictures, LLC, which, along with other affiliates, has promoted many other BitTorrent infringement cases in Oregon and many other states.

Like many other similar lawsuits filed in U.S. District Court, District of Oregon, the Fathers and Daughters case was filed by Salem, OR attorney Carl D. Crowell and Crowell Law.

UPDATE (8/10/16): Additional Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC cases have been filed in the District.  A case listing with links to the complaints is below.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of the case can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Filed: 02/21/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00315
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. Doe-24.21.251.29, et al

Filed: 04/26/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00714
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. Doe-67.189.32.29

Filed: 05/26/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00925
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. Doe-24.21.251.29

Filed: 05/26/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00926
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. Doe-71.237.218.250

Filed: 05/26/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00927
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. Doe-76.105.177.33

Filed: 07/16/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-01443
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. Doe-50.38.189.122

PTG Nevada, LLC, the owner of copyrights to the Nicholas Cage film Pay the Ghost, has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against 14 Doe defendants in the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada.

As Troll Defense earlier reported, Pay the Ghost was released in September 2015 and widely panned in critical reviews.

The complaint makes typical allegations of BitTorrent-based copyright infringement, with details regarding the several Does’ asserted common participation in a file-sharing “swarm.”  The lawsuit seeks statutory damages pursuant to the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees and costs, and an injunction against further infringement, as well as an order “finding that each Defendant is jointly and severally liable for the direct infringement of each other Defendant.”

And, as with other similar PTG lawsuits in other jursidictions, Voltage Pictures, LLC is the likely instigator, with a co-production credit on Pay the Ghost.  The  Nevada lawsuit was filed by Charles C. Rainey of Rainey Legal Group PLLC in Las Vegas.  Below is a case listing with link to the complaint.

Filed: 02/05/2016
Case No: 2:16-cv-00231
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-14 

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of the case can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

QOTD Film Investment Ltd., which holds copyrights to the yet-unreleased Werner Herzog epic “Queen of the Desert,” has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal court in Oregon. This appears to be the first such lawsuit in the U.S., outside of another suit in Arizona, according to Antonelli Law.  Queen of the Desert stars James Franco, Nicole Kidman and Robert Pattinson.

The new lawsuit in Oregon alleges copyright infringement by 7 separate “Doe” parties through their use of BitTorrent file-sharing software. Along with generic allegations of BitTorrent-based copyright infringement, the suits also state that “The defendants’ IP addresses have been observed as associated with the peer-to-peer exchange of a large number of copyrighted titles through the BitTorrent network with over 6,000
acts of distribution of content in violation of U.S. copyright law associated with these IP addresses alone, as such the defendants’ conduct is clearly willful and persistent.” The case seeks statutory damages pursuant to the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees and costs, and an injunction against further infringement.

The Oregon complaint also alleges that “QOTD is an affiliate of Benaroya Pictures, a production company with a notable catalog of major motion pictures.”  According to a 2012 piece in The Wrap, Benaroya Pictures was founded by “Michael Benaroya, scion of a prominent Seattle real-estate family,” who began backing films in 2009, including past titles such as “New York, I Love You,” “The Romantics,” “Catch .44,” “Margin Call” and “The Words.” According to IMDb, Benaroya Pictures has several other unreleased titles in production or development, and Troll Defense would not be surprised to see more of its titles in BitTorrent litigation in the future.

Like many other similar lawsuits filed in U.S. District Court, District of Oregon, the QOTD case was filed by Salem, OR attorney Carl D. Crowell and Crowell Law.  A case listing with link to the complaint is below.

UPDATE (8/10/16): Several additional single-Doe matters were filed by QOTD.  This follows a handful of decisions from this Court which each concluded that BitTorrent cases were not appropriate for permissive joinder of several defendants.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of the case can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Filed: 02/10/2016
Case No: 3:16-cv-00246
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. BITTORRENT USERS: DOE-67.166.95.111, et al.

Filed: 03/27/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00523
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe-71.63.134.62

Filed: 03/27/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00524
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe-73.157.212.56

Filed: 03/27/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00525
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe-71.59.237.236

Filed: 04/26/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00715
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe-24.20.43.126

Filed: 05/26/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00930
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe-73.67.182.24

Filed: 06/14/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-01081
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe-71.193.138.191

Filed: 07/11/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-01761
QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. Doe-71.59.242.204

Before I Go Productions, Inc., the owner of rights to the 2014 Nicole Kidman thriller Before I Go to Sleep, has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal court in Oregon.  This appears to be the first such lawsuit in the U.S., outside of earlier suits in Illinois, according to Antonelli Law.

Before I Go to Sleep,  which also features Colin Firth, was released in 2014 to mixed reviews.  A Variety review commented that it was a “dopey diversion,” with the viewer’s attention mostly drawn to the film’s “escalating, po-faced ludicrousness.”

The new lawsuit in Oregon alleges copyright infringement by 6 separate “Doe” parties through their use of BitTorrent file-sharing software.  Along with generic allegations of BitTorrent-based copyright infringement, the suits also state that “BIG comes to court seeking relief as the motion picture, once released, became one of the most trafficked films in the BitTorrent network and is being illegally downloaded and distributed countless times worldwide with many confirmed instances of infringing activity traced to Oregon.”  The case seeks statutory damages pursuant to the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees and costs, and an injunction against further infringement.

The complaint also alleges that the plaintiff “is an affiliate of Nu Image / Millennium Films, production companies and distributors of a notable catalog of major motion pictures.”  In addition to Before I Go to Sleep, several other films distributed or produced by Nu Image/Millennium have been the subject of prior BitTorrent copyright enforcement actions, including The Expendables, Charlie CountrymanBad Lieutenant, Automata and The Humbling.

Like many other similar lawsuits filed in U.S. District Court, District of Oregon, the Before I Go Productions case was filed by Salem, OR attorney Carl D. Crowell and Crowell Law.  A case listing with link to the complaint is below.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of the case can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Filed: 12/06/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02278
Before I Go Productions, Inc. v. Doe-73.25.37.15 et al

Dish Network, LLC has filed a copyright lawsuit in Texas against 5 Doe parties accused of unlawfully “re-transmitting” certain Arabic-language television programming.

Dish Network is a Colorado-based company that provides TV service to over 14 million satellite and broadband subscribers.  According to the complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Dish Network claims to have the exclusive right to distribute and “publicly perform” certain international channel programming, including Al Jazeera Arabic News and various channels operated by Middle East Broadcasting center, based in Dubai, UAE.

As regards the Doe defendants, the Dish Network complaint alleges:

Upon information and belief, Defendants capture live broadcast signals of the DISH Channels, transcode these signals into a format useful for streaming over the Internet, and then upload the content to their computer servers. … Defendants use computer servers to unlawfully retransmit the DISH Channels in the United States. The DISH Channels were observed during testing of an unauthorized set-top box capable of receiving Defendants’ unauthorized retransmissions. The DISH Channels are also identified in the user interface that viewers navigate when accessing content through the unauthorized set-top box and software applications.

The lawsuits seek damages including Defendants’ profits and statutory penalties; injunctive relief to cause the Defendants to cease infringement; and “impoundment and disposition of all infringing articles under 17 U.S.C. § 503.”

UPDATE (10/21/17):  Dish Network has filed a separate similar action in the same Court, this time targeting a software “Developer” and group of “Operators” involved with an unlicensed service known as “Zem TV” which is made available as an “add-on” for the Kodi media player.   In part the lawsuit alleges:

 Upon information and belief, Developer: selects and locates the channels that are
retransmitted on the ZemTV service; updates and posts new versions of the ZemTV add-on on
www.tvaddons.ag and www.tvaddons.org; captures live broadcast signals of the Protected
Channels outside the United States; transcodes these signals into a format useful for streaming
over the Internet; and then uploads and transfers the transcoded content to computer servers that are controlled and maintained by Developer.

Bot lawsuits, Dish Network LLC v. Does 1-5, No. 4:15-cv-03394, and Dish Network LLC v. Does 1-4, No. 4:17-cv-01618 were filed by Stephen M. Ferguson of Hagan Noll & Boyle, LLC in Houston, Texas.

November saw the first Pacific Northwest BitTorrent copyright lawsuits filed in Oregon by Clear Skies Nevada, LLC, which owns the rights to the 2014 film Good Kill. This film concerns a military drone pilot (played by Ethan Hawke) who questions the ethics of dropping bombs in Afghanistan from his remote post in Nevada.

Clear Skies Nevada was known for a large number of previous copyright infringement filings in Illinois, Michigan and Texas, with lesser numbers of cases in Colorado, Florida and Wisconsin, as reported by Antonelli Law.

The new cases, filed in the U.S. District Court, District of Oregon, are the work of Salem, Oregon lawyers Carl D. Crowell and Crowell Law.  Like countless prior copyright suits filed in this District Court (and many other courts), the lawsuits allege infringement of the films by anonymous “Doe” defendants through the use of BitTorrent file-sharing software.

Two of the Clear Skies Nevada cases are multiple-plaintiff suits which allege the infringement by a single Doe party of Good Kill and another film.  One includes Pay the Ghosta 2014 Nicolas Cage film; a second suit involves American Heist, a 2015 action flick with Adrien Brody.  Crowell has used this multi-film tactic before in a combination of Pay the Ghost, Dallas Buyers Club and The Cobbler.

A commonality among all of these films is their affiliation with Voltage Pictures, LLC, which has distribution rights or co-production credits with regard to each release.  Voltage Pictures is said to be the driving force behind hundreds of similar BitTorrent copyright actions that have been filed in recent years.

Two other recent Clear Skies Nevada cases joins together the company’s claims against groupings of 8 and 9 separate Doe parties.  As discussed in a prior post, this indicates a continued effort by Crowell Law and its film company clients to return to a prior pattern of multi-Doe lawsuits in Oregon, based on allegations of common infringing conduct and permissive joinder.

UPDATE (8/10/16):  Following a recent decision by the Oregon District Court disallowing joinder of the several Doe parties, Clear Skies filed a number of single-Doe lawsuits.

A case listing with links to complaints is below:

Filed: 11/15/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02140
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC and PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-73.11.62.88

Filed: 11/15/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02141
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC and Glacier Films (USA), Inc. v. Doe-24.21.103.229

Filed: 11/15/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02142
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe-98.232.166.89, et al

Filed: 11/30/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02233
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe-76.115.41.175 et al

Filed: 05/10/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00808
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe-24.20.18.61

Filed: 05/10/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00809
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe-50.186.19.28

Filed: 05/10/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00810
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe-73.164.170.35

Filed: 05/10/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00811
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe-76.105.226.122

Filed: 07/05/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-01364
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe-98.232.169.70

Filed: 07/27/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-01527
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe-73.37.1.54