Lawyers representing several production companies have filed numerous copyright lawsuits against over 100 “John Doe” defendants in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii.

In each case, the plaintiff film production company alleges violations of its rights under the U.S. Copyright act arising from the Doe defendants’ alleged infringement of the film via the use of BitTorrent filing sharing technology.

In three of the new cases, the plaintiff is Cobbler Nevada, LLC.  As Troll Defense previously reported, The Cobbler is comedy film starring Adam Sandler that was widely released earlier this year, with generally unfavorable reviews and disappointing box office revenues.  Cobbler Nevada has filed scores of similar copyright lawsuits throughout the nation in the past year, including many such claims in California, Colorado, Oregon, Texas and Washington.

In one Hawai’i case, the filer is Clear Skies Nevada, LLC, which owns the rights to the 2014 film Good Kill.  This film concerns a military drone pilot (played by Ethan Hawke) who questions the ethics of dropping bombs in Afghanistan from his remote post in Nevada.

The complaints describe in some detail the activities of hired investigator Maverickeye UG to track and document the alleged infringements.  The cases each join together multiple separate Doe parties, in a purported exercise of permissive joinder pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2).  As if to ward off possible challenges to joinder, the plaintiffs allege that “each of the Defendants is jointly and severally liable for the infringing activities of each of the other Defendants,” and even make allegations of contributory infringement:

By participating in the BitTorrent swarm with the other Defendants, each Defendant induced, caused or materially contributed to the infringing conduct of each other Defendant.

Each Defendant knew or should have known that the other BitTorrent users in a swarm with it were directly infringing the Plaintiff’s copyrighted Work by copying constituent elements of the registered Work that are original. Indeed, each Defendant directly participated in and therefore materially contributed to each other Defendants’ infringing activities.

In each case, the plaintiffs seek statutory damages, which range from $750 minimum per work up to $150,000 (if infringements are deemed “willful”), plus injunctions against further infringement, attorney’s fees, and court costs.

UPDATE (4/28/16): A host of additional now-familiar copyright plaintiffs filed new BitTorrent lawsuits in the Hawaii District Court.

One suit was filed by LHF Productions, Inc., which holds copyrights to the action flick London Has Fallen, featuring Gerard Butler, Morgan Freeman and Aaron Eckhart in an assassination plot caper. This follows many other LHF suits recently filed in other jurisdictions.  As reported before, LHF is an affiliate of Nu Image / Millennium Films, which hold interests in films that have been the subject of prior enforcement actions, including Automata, The Humbling, The Expendables, Charlie Countryman and Bad Lieutenant.

Another action was filed by PTG Nevada, LLC, the rights-holder to the 2014 Nic Cage thriller Pay the Ghost.  As discussed elsewhere, Pay the Ghost was released in September 2015 and widely panned in critical reviews.

A third plaintiff, QOTD Film Investment Ltd., holds copyrights to the newly-released Werner Herzog epic Queen of the Desert.  As noted in a prior troll defense post, this film stars James Franco, Nicole Kidman and Robert Pattinson, and the new suit is part of an emerging national trolling campaign.

Finally, another similar case was filed in the same court by Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC, which owns the rights to the Russell Crowe drama Fathers and Daughters, slated for a U.S. release later in 2016.

All of these cases were filed by Honolulu attorney Gregory A. Ferren.

UPDATE (4/17/17):

Several new suits were lodged by Cook Productions, LLC, an entity holding copyrights in the recently released Eddie Murphy period drama, Mr. Church.  As troll defense previously reported, Cook Productions is an affiliate of Cinelou Films, a production company with a “notable catalog of major motion pictures.” The Mr. Church lawsuits  filed across the U.S. represent the first known attempts by Cinelou Films at “troll-style” copyright litigation.

Other cases were brought in the name of I.T. Productions, LLC which holds rights in the 2016 film, I.T., a “techno-thriller” starring Pierce Brosnan as a technophobic aviation tycoon troubled by technical problems affecting his launch of a new aircraft rental app.

One recent case was filed by WWE Studios Finance Corp. regarding Eliminators, a 2016 action film starring Scott Adkins and WWE wrestler Wade Barrett.  As posted seperately, WWE Studios is a relative newcomer to the filing of mass BitTorrent copyright lawsuits.

UPDATE (8/11/17):

Two recent cases were filed by UN4 Productions, Inc.  As Troll Defense has reported, UN4 Productions owns rights in the 2016 action flick Boyka: Undisputed, also known as Undisputed IV, which stars Scott Adkins as an MMA fighter grappling with the fallout from an accidental death in the ring.

An additional action was filed by Venice PI, LLC, and based on the 2017 action/comedy Once Upon A Time in Venice, which features Bruce Willis on a caper which ensues after his beloved pet is stolen.  Described in Variety review as a “direct-to-video-style Nineties throwback,” the reviewer also saw the possibility that the producers would seek revenue from “ancillary and streaming.”  Combining a film’s lack of box office success with a likely substantial budget has been observed to be associated with significant amount of past BitTorrent copyright litigation.

I.T. Productions, WWE Studios and Venice PI are affiliates of Voltage Pictures, LLC, the instigator of countless other BitTorrent lawsuits involving film titles such as Dallas Buyers Club, Good Kill, The Cobbler, Fathers & Daugthers, Pay the Ghost, and The Hurt Locker.

Each of these newer cases was filed by attorney Kerry S. Culpepper of Culpepper IP, PLLC in Kailua-Kona, HI.

UPDATE (10/21/17):

In addition to several new cases filed by Venice, PI, LLC and UN4 Productions, Inc. in recent weeks, additional BitTorrent suits were filed by Headhunter, LLC, another affiliate of notorious copyright enforcer Voltage Pictures, LLC.

As Troll Defense has written, the Headhunter, LLC filings involve the 2016 drama flick A Family Man, which stars Willem Dafoe as a striving executive in a job placement firm struggling to balance work and family troubles.  Although its production began years ago, the film was only released in theaters in late July of 2017.

Each of these newer cases was filed by attorney Kerry S. Culpepper of Culpepper IP, PLLC in Kailua-Kona, HI.

A case listing, with links to available complaints, are below.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of these actions can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Case No: 1:15-cv-00427
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-42
Filed: 10/16/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-00428
Cobbler Nevada, LLC vs. Does 1-21
Filed: 10/16/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-00429
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-10
Filed: 10/16/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-00430
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-11
Filed: 10/16/2015

Case No. 1:16-cv-00187
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v Does 1-12
Filed: 04/22/2016

Case No. 1:16-cv-00188
PTG Nevada, LLC vs. Does 1-15
Filed: 04/22/2016

Case No. 1:16-cv-00189
QOTD Film Investment, Ltd. vs. Does 1-9
Filed: 04/22/2016

Case No. 1:16-cv-00190
LHF Productions, Inc. vs. Does 1-16
Filed: 04/22/2016

Filed: 12/02/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00637
Cook Productions, LLC v. Does 1 through 8

Filed: 12/02/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00638
Cook Productions, LLC v. Does 1 through 5

Filed: 12/02/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00639
Cook Productions, LLC v. Does 1 through 4

Filed: 12/02/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00641
I.T. Productions, LLC v. Does 1-6

Filed: 01/25/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00034
Cook Productions, LLC v. Does 1-15

Filed: 01/25/2017
Case No. 1:16-cv-00035
I.T. Productions, LLC v. Does 1-3

Filed: 2/27/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00084
I.T. Productions, LLC v. Does 1-5

Filed: 03/24/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00129
Cook Productions, LLC v. Does 1-12

Filed: 04/10/2017
Case No: 1:17-cv-00165
WWE Studios Finance Corp. v. Does 1-16

Filed: 06/13/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00282
UN4 Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-20

Filed: 07/12/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00331
UN4 Productions, Inc. v. DOE Defendants 1-20

Filed: 07/15/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00335
Venice PI, LLC v. Does 1-20

Filed: 08/18/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00416
Headhunter LLC v. Does 1-16

Filed: 08/22/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00420
Venice PI, LLC v. Does 1-14

Filed: 09/08/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00448
UN4 Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-16

Filed: 09/22/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00480
UN4 Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-24

Filed: 09/27/2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00488
Venice PI, LLC v. Does 1-16

In a new tactic, notorious Salem, Oregon attorney Carl D. Crowell has combined claims involving multiple different films into one lawsuit against a single unfortunate Doe defendant.  Like countless prior copyright suits Crowell has filed in the U.S. District Court, District of Oregon, these allege infringement of the films via the use of BitTorrent file-sharing software.

The suits include as plaintiffs Dallas Buyers Club, LLC, Cobbler Nevada, LLC, and PTG Nevada, LLC.  DBC, LLC of course owns copyrights in Dallas Buyers Club, the 2013 film that has been the subject of many prior copyright lawsuits against hundreds or thousands of defendants across the country.   Cobbler Nevada controls the rights in The Cobbler, a terrible film starring Adam Sandler that was released last year just months before the first of scores of copyright lawsuits were launched in numerous U.S. Courts.  PTG Nevada’s entry is a Nicolas Cage film, Pay The Ghost, that made its national BitTorrent trolling debut in the Oregon District Court.

A commonality among the three plaintiffs is their affiliation with Voltage Pictures, LLC, which has distribution or co-production credits with regard to each the films.

One can only assume the combination of multiple works is intended to drive up the potential statutory damages that may be recovered from the defendant.  Under the Copyright Act, these damages, which range from $750 to $150,000 (if infringements are deemed “willful”), are typically tabulated on a “per work” basis.  In addition to damages, the plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, attorney’s fees, and costs.

Case No: 3:15-cv-02020
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC et al v. Doe-24.22.91.38

Filed: 10/27/2015

Synopses, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against several Oregon individuals, alleging infringement of various forms of electronic design automation (“EDA”) software for which Synopsys holds copyrights.  The software is intended for testing and designing computer processing chips and semiconductors.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, with Case No. 3:15-cv-01953, says that:

EDA generally refers to using computers to design, verify, and simulate the performance of electronic circuits on a chip. For more than 25 years, Synopsys’ solutions have helped semiconductor manufacturers and electronics companies design, test, and manufacture microchips for a wide range of products.

Among the works claimed to be infringed are the “Design Compiler, PrimeTime, Formality, IC Compiler, CustomExplorer, HSIMplus, HSPICE, and NanoTime applications.”

The defendants include four named individuals whom are believed to be residents of Portland, Oregon, as well as 10 Doe parties.  The plaintiff claims to know specifically how many times the named defendants have circumvented access control systems.

The complaint alleges violations of 17 U.S.C. § 1201 via the alleged use of counterfeit license keys.  The relief sought includes statutory damages of $2,500 for each violation, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and costs.

The complaint was filed by Brenna K. Legaard of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.

PTG Nevada, LLC, the owner of copyrights to the recent Nicholas Cage film Pay the Ghost, has filed several copyright infringement lawsuits in federal court in Oregon.  These appear to be the first such lawsuits in the U.S.

Pay the Ghost was released in September and widely panned in critical reviews. Variety‘s reviewer concluded that “this somnolent supernatural thriller is a low-energy wash from start to finish,” while RogerEbert.com gave it one star.

The lawsuits, each against a single Doe party, seek statutory damages pursuant to the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees and costs, and an injunction against further infringement.  Along with generic allegations of BitTorrent-based copyright infringement, the suits also state that “PTG comes to court seeking relief as the motion picture Pay The Ghost, once released, became one of the top 10 most trafficked films in the BitTorrent network and is being illegally downloaded and distributed countless times worldwide with many confirmed instances of infringing activity traced to Oregon.”

Like many other similar lawsuits filed in U.S. District Court, District of Oregon, the PTG Nevada cases were filed by Salem, OR attorney Carl D. Crowell.  And, as with other similar lawsuits, Voltage Pictures is the likely instigator, with a co-production credit on Pay the Ghost.  A case listing with links to complaints is below.

UPDATE (12/3/15): PTG Nevada, LLC has filed recent actions including multiple Doe parties, 8 and 9 per case.  Unlike other recent multi-Doe filings in the Oregon District Court, this complaint does not specifically allege common use of the Popcorn Time application, which, as previously reported, represents an apparent attempt to escape a prior court ruling against multi-Doe BitTorrent cases on grounds on improper joinder.

UPDATE (8/10/16): After adverse rulings from the court on permissive joinder issues, PTG Nevada has resorted to filing additional “Singleton” Doe suits in the Oregon District Court, lodging several news cases in recent months.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of these actions can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Case No: 3:15-cv-01847
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-67.170.183.19
Filed: 09/29/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01848
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-76.115.211.63
Filed: 09/29/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-02017
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-24.20.158.26, et al

Filed: 10/27/2015

Filed: 11/29/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02228
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-67.171.138.240, et al

Filed: 03/30/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00549
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-75.150.35.20

Filed: 05/23/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-00900
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-71.38.152.120

Filed: 06/22/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-01188
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-73.37.80.127

Filed: 06/30/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-01350
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-24.22.104.76

Filed: 07/16/2016
Case No. 3:16-cv-01442
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Doe-50.53.133.123

This past week Cobbler Nevada, LLC filed copyright infringement suits against nearly 200 John Doe parties in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.

As Troll Defense previously reported, The Cobbler is comedy film starring Adam Sandler that was widely released earlier this year, with generally unfavorable reviews and uncertain box office revenues.

The new Western District cases make allegations of infringement via the use of BitTorrent technology which are similar in form to other complaints filed in this same court with respect to Dallas Buyer Club.   The new suits seek judgment for actual or statutory damages, attorney’s fees and costs, a court order compelling the Does to destroy infringing files, and, “a report in writing under oath setting forth in detail the manner and form in which Defendants have complied with the terms of the ordered relief.”

UPDATE (10/15/15): Cobbler Nevada,LLC returned to the Seattle federal court and filed on October 9, 2015 two additional cases against a total of 54 Does.

These Cobbler filings were each made by Seattle attorney David A. Lowe of Lowe Graham Jones PLLC.  A case listing with links to complaints is below.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of these actions can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Case No: 2:15-cv-01404
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-10
Filed: 09/02/2015

Case No: 2:15-cv-01406
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-11
Filed: 09/02/2015

Case No: 2:15-cv-01408
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-10
Filed: 09/02/2015

Case No: 2:15-cv-01420
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-15
Filed: 09/03/2015

Case No: 2:15-cv-01421
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-11
Filed: 09/03/2015

Case No: 2:15-cv-01425
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-15
Filed: 09/03/2015

Case No. 2:15-cv-01430
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-14
Filed: 09/04/2015

Case No. 2:15-cv-01431
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-26
Filed: 09/04/2015

Case No. 2:15-cv-01432
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-32
Filed: 09/04/2015

Case No. 2:15-cv-01435
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-36
Filed: 09/04/2015

Case No: 2:15-cv-01443
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-16
Filed: 09/08/2015

Case No: 2:15-cv-01614
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
Filed: 10/09/2015

Case No: 2:15-cv-01616
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
Filed: 10/09/2015

In the past two months, nationwide mass copyright plaintiffs Dallas Buyers Club, LLC and Cobbler Nevada, LLC have filed a modest number of lawsuits against John Doe parties in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of California.

As Troll Defense previously reported, Dallas Buyers Club is an Oscar-winning drama starring Matthew McConaughey  that has become the subject of hundreds of copyright actions in U.S. District Courts (and a few state courts) across the country.  The nominal plaintiff’s enforcement activities are conducted in collaboration with Voltage Pictures, LLC, which also has production credits or distribution interests in Dallas Buyers Club and several other film titles in litigation.

As noted beforeThe Cobbler is comedy film starring Adam Sandler that was widely released earlier this year, with generally unfavorable reviews and uncertain box office revenues.

The Southern District cases make allegations of infringement via the use of BitTorrent technology – specifically naming the “µTorrent Mac 1.8.1 distribution system” – and seek judgment for  statutory damages, attorney’s fees and costs, and injunctive relief.

It is not known why relatively few such suits have been filed in this U.S. District Court, situated in San Diego.  While considerably smaller in population than the Central District of California, a hotbed for copyright and trademark litigation, the Southern District still encompasses over 3 million residents.   The new Dallas Buyers Club cases are filed on a single-Doe basis, which likely stems from an April 2013 decision by the District Court in a pornographic Bittorrent case, holding that permissive joinder was improper and ordering that all but one Doe should be severed from the case.

The lawsuits were filed by attorney James S. Davis of Chula Vista, CA.  Case listings with links to complaints are below.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of these actions can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Case No: 3:15-cv-01614
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. DOE-72.197.35.160
Filed: 07/21/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01615
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. DOE-174.65.2.54
Filed: 07/21/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01844
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Doe-68.107.64.239
Filed: 08/19/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01845
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Doe-75.81.191.27
Filed: 08/19/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-02062
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. DOE-68.7.39.29
Filed: 09/16/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-02063
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. DOE-68.8.32.194
Filed: 09/16/2015

As reported by Torrent Freak, the producers of The Cobbler have found a new angle on their nationwide copyright infringement litigation campaign, targeting 11 alleged users of the film-streaming site known as Popcorn Time in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Oregon.

As Troll Defense previously noted, The Cobbler is comedy film starring Adam Sandler that was widely released earlier this year, with generally unfavorable reviews and uncertain box office revenues.

Popcorn Time is a site with a legitimate look-and-feel that invites its users to download its software and very easily “stream[] movies and TV shows.” The site even quips: “Just take care of the popcorn and leave the rest to us.”

In fact, the Popcorn Time landing page warns “[d]ownloading copyrighted material may be illegal in your country. Use at your own risk.”  The new complaint, filed by Cobbler Nevada, LLC, provides further detail regarding the Popcorn Time site disclaimers:

When the Popcorn Time software is installed, users are required to accept Terms of Service and acknowledge: “ALL MOVIES . . . ARE STREAMED USING THE P2P BIT TORRENT PROTOCOL. . . . BY WATCHING A MOVIE WITH THIS APPLICATION YOU MIGHT BE COMMITTING COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS…”

After gaining in popularity since it launched in early 2014, Popcorn Time and its supporters have been the subject of law enforcement and content industry enforcement in Israel, the Netherlands and other nations.  This week, two “fan page” publishers were arrested by police in Denmark while their site domains were ordered to be confiscated, according to Torrent Freak.

Owing to Popcorn Time’s underlying use of BitTorrent technology, many of the technical allegations of the lawsuit are similar to those in other Cobbler lawsuits filed by the same attorney, Carl D. Crowell of Salem, Oregon.  However, in the new complaint Crowell goes so far as to compare the possession of Popcorn Time to that of “a burglary tool or theft device” that is criminalized by Oregon law.  The 11 Doe parties are listed in an exhibit to the complaint (shown here) by IP address and “geo-located” city.

What may be most interesting about this suit is whether its theory will serve as an avenue for BitTorrent plaintiffs in Oregon to return to the filing of multi-Doe copyright actions using permissive joinder.  In May 2013, as Troll Defense then reported, Judge Ann Aiken entered an order in several matters then pending in the District Court which found that joinder arising from the fact that a group of otherwise unrelated Does may have all shared the same infringing file or participated in the same “swarm” was insufficient.  A year later, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit came to a similar conclusion.  Since the May 2013 decision, essentially every BitTorrent case in Oregon has been filed against only a single Doe party.  Depending on what occurs with the Popcorn Time matter, future suits may follow a different path.

Carl D. Crowell has also filed on behalf of Survivor Productions, Inc. a second Popcorn Time-related lawsuit against 16 Doe defendants in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon.  As Troll Defense previously reported, the film Survivor features Milla Jovovich as a falsely accused Foreign Service Officer who works to unravel a terrorist plot against the U.S. The allegations of the Survivor complaint are virtually identical to the Cobbler suit discussed above.

More recently, Dallas Buyers Club, LLC filed a similar lawsuit against 10 Does accused of using Popcorn Time to infringe Dallas Buyers Club, the 2013 film which is the subject of hundreds of prior lawsuits filed by Dallas Buyers Club, LLC in the Oregon District Court and around the nation.

UPDATED (11/30/15): Cobbler Nevada, LLC filed two additional Popcorn Time lawsuits against 23 additional Doe parties.

Case listing, with links to complaints:

Case No: 3:15-cv-01550
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Anonymous Users of Popcorn Time: Does 1-11
Filed: 08/16/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01587
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Anonymous Users of Popcorn Time: Does 1-16
Filed: 08/20/2015

Case No.:3:15-cv-01779
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Anonymous Users of Popcorn Time: Does 1-10
Filed: 09/20/2015

Filed: 10/21/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-01988
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Users of Popcorn Time No. 1-12

Filed: 10/21/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-01991
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Users of Popcorn Time No. 1-11

On a single day last week, Cobbler Nevada, LLC filed copyright infringement suits against over 350 John Doe parties in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.

As Troll Defense previously reported, The Cobbler is comedy film starring Adam Sandler that was widely released earlier this year, with generally unfavorable reviews and uncertain box office revenues.

The new Houston cases make allegations of infringement via the use of BitTorrent technology, and seek judgment for actual or statutory damages, attorney’s fees and costs, and, curiously, “an Order of Impoundment under 17 U.S.C. §§503 and 509(a) impounding all infringing copies of Plaintiff’s MOVIE which are in Defendants’ possession or under their control.”

These Cobbler filings were each made by Houston attorney Daniel R. Kirshbaum.  Case listings with links to complaints are below.

Parties and subscribers receiving ISP notices of these actions can contact attorney Benjamin Justus for a free consultation regarding possible options.

Case No: 4:15-cv-02041
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-24
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02043
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-25
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02044
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-25
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02045
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-26
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02046
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-27
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02047
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-27
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02048
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-28
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02050
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-29
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02051
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-10
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02053
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-11
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02055
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-14
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02057
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-14
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02058
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-20
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02059
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-21
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02060
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-22
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02061
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-23
Filed: 07/16/2015

Case No: 4:15-cv-02062
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-24
Filed: 07/16/2015

The producers of the UK espionage film Survivor have initiated a handful of BitTorrent copyright lawsuits in the U.S. District Court, District of Oregon.  According to some observers, these may be the first such lawsuits filed in the U.S. Courts.

In Survivor, Milla Jovovich plays a falsely accused Foreign Service Officer who works to unravel a terrorist plot against the U.S. while being pursued through London’s streets and subways.  In a Variety write-up, the reviewer found that the film had “a solid middle section,” despite being hindered by “a generic title and low buzz factor.”

Like many similar lawsuits in the same District Court, the Survivor cases were filed by Salem attorney Carl D. Crowell.  The lawsuits, each against a single Doe party, seek statutory damages pursuant to the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees and costs, and an injunction against further infringement.

Case listing with links to complaints:

Case No: 3:15-cv-01302
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-73.25.230.253
Filed: 07/13/2015

Case No: 6:15-cv-01303
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-71.237.216.228
Filed: 07/13/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01479
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-24.21.204.116
Filed: 08/06/2015

Case No: 6:15-cv-01480
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-67.171.216.90
Filed: 08/06/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01481
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-71.238.59.105
Filed: 08/06/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01482
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-71.59.252.243
Filed: 08/06/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01483
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-73.25.50.104
Filed: 08/06/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01593
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-50.186.40.47
Filed: 08/21/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01594
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-71.59.135.180
Filed: 08/21/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01595
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-71.63.226.230
Filed: 08/21/2015

Case No: 3:15-cv-01596
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-76.115.49.10
Filed: 08/21/2015

Case No: 6:15-cv-01597
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-198.0.60.97
Filed: 08/21/2015

Filed: 10/30/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02052
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-173.164.108.181

Filed: 11/06/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02088
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-76.105.249.45

Filed: 11/06/2015
Case No: 6:15-cv-02089
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-73.37.16.100

Filed: 11/06/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02090
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-71.236.186.192

Filed: 11/06/2015
Case No: 6:15-cv-02091
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-24.20.13.24

Filed: 11/06/2015
Case No: 3:15-cv-02092
Survivor Productions, Inc. v. Doe-71.59.145.120

In recent months, frequent mass litigants Dallas Buyers Club, LLC and Cobbler Nevada, LLC have filed a number of multi-Doe copyright infringement lawsuits in the U.S. District Court, District of Colorado.

As Troll Defense has previously writtenThe Cobbler is comedy film starring Adam Sandler that was widely released earlier this year, with generally unfavorable reviews and uncertain box office revenues.  The Cobbler cases, like many similar BitTorrent matters, allege both direct and contributory infringement claims against the several Doe defendants, and seek statutory damages, attorney’s fees and injunctive relief.  The Cobbler matters were filed by Scott T. Kannady of Brown & Kannady, LLC.

The Dallas Buyers Club cases are orchestrated by the nominal plaintiff, Dallas Buyers Club, LLC, and Voltage Pictures, LLC, which retains some distribution rights to the film.  In the Colorado filings, Dallas Buyers Club boldly asks for massive damages equivalent to “actual damages and any additional profits made by each Defendant pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504-(a)-(b) or statutory damages in the amount of $150,000 per Defendant pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504-(a) and (c), whichever is greater.”  The DBC cases listed below were filed by David J. Stephenson, Jr. of The Rocky Mountain Thunder Law Firm.

UPDATE (12/8/15): Recent cases were filed in Colorado by Clear Skies Nevada, LLC, which owns the rights to the 2014 film Good Kill. This film concerns a military drone pilot (played by Ethan Hawke) who questions the ethics of dropping bombs in Afghanistan from his remote post in Nevada.  The Clear Skies case was also filed by David J. Stephenson, Jr. of The Rocky Mountain Thunder Law Firm.

UPDATE (3/1/16): At least one recent case was lodged by PTG Nevada, LLC, the rights-holder to the 2014 Nic Cage thriller Pay the Ghost.  As discussed elsewhere, Pay the Ghost was released in September 2015 and widely panned in critical reviews.  The PTG Nevada case was filed by Scott T. Kannady of Brown & Kannady, LLC.

UPDATE (6/12/16): Several recent cases were filed in the same court by Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC, which owns the rights to the Russell Crowe drama Fathers and Daughters, slated for a U.S. release later in 2016.  The Fathers & Daughters cases were filed by David J. Stephenson, Jr.

A commonality among all of these films is their affiliation with Voltage Pictures, LLC, which has distribution rights or co-production credits with regard to each release.  Voltage Pictures is said to be the driving force behind hundreds of similar BitTorrent copyright actions that have been filed in recent years.

Case listing, with links to complaints:

Case No. 1:15-cv-716
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-9
Filed: 04/07/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-792
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-9
Filed: 04/15/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-896
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-8
Filed: 04/28/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-956
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-7
Filed: 05/05/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-1088
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-14
Filed: 05/26/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-1160
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-26
Filed: 06/03/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-1175
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-26
Filed: 06/04/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-1203
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-14
Filed: 06/09/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-1343
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-15
Filed: 06/24/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-01373
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-25
Filed: 06/26/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-1396
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-21
Filed: 06/30/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-01407
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-22
Filed: 07/02/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-01449
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-17
Filed: 07/08/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-01558
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-11
Filed: 07/22/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-01563
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-10
Filed: 07/23/2015

Filed: 08/05/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-01674
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-35

Case No: 1:15-cv-01689
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-34
Filed: 08/06/2015

Filed: 08/12/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-01742
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-34

Case No: 1:15-cv-01754
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-33
Filed: 08/13/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-01788
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-32
Filed: 08/19/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-01814
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-31
Filed: 08/21/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-01855
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-29
Filed: 08/27/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-01897
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-28
Filed: 09/01/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-01908
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-27
Filed: 09/02/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-01963
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-26
Filed: 09/09/2015

Case No. 1:15-cv-01977
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-25
Filed: 09/10/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-02031
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-24
Filed: 09/16/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-02043
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-18
Filed: 09/17/2015

Case No.: 1:15-cv-02065
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-21
Filed: 09/18/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-02077
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-17
Filed: 09/21/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-02100
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-17
Filed: 09/23/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-02159
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-16
Filed: 09/30/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-02202
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-16
Filed: 10/05/2015

Case No:1:15-cv-02217
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-15
Filed: 10/06/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-02259
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-11
Filed: 10/12/2015

Case No: 1:15-cv-02331
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-12
Filed: 10/20/2015

Filed: 12/01/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-02617
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-11

Filed: 12/07/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-02644
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-20

Filed: 12/09/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-02660
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-18

Filed: 12/14/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-02706
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-34

Filed: 12/17/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-02739
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. John Does 1 – 5

Filed: 12/17/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-02747
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-16

Filed: 12/21/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-02771
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-14

Filed: 12/22/2015
Case No: 1:15-cv-02791
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-15

Filed: 01/19/2016
Case No:1:16-cv-00128
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe 1 et al

Filed: 02/02/2016
Case No: 1:16-cv-00246
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-10

Filed: 02/11/2016
Case No: 1:16-cv-00334
Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-10

Filed: 02/24/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00455
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-20

Filed: 03/03/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00529
PTG Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-13

Filed: 03/08/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00560
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. John Does 1-15

Filed: 03/11/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00598
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. John Does 1 – 10

Filed: 03/16/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00613
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. John Does 1-20

Filed: 03/22/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00670
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. John Does 1-20

Filed: 04/14/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-00852
PTG Nevada, LLC v. John Does 1-9

Case No. 1:16-cv-1170
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-10
Filed: 05/18/2016

Filed: 06/01/2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-01318
Fathers & Daughters Nevada, LLC v. Does 1-7